UNIVERSITY CHOICE PART 2
The study also featured the answers of the parents of applicants and first-year students, who were also asked about the motives for choosing a university for their child. Let's start
essay writer free online with the fact that 50% of the university was chosen by parents who were more interested in questions: the complexity of entrance examinations, tuition fees if the child did not go to the budget department (the absolute majority gave priority to universities with lower tuition fees), further employment, the presence of a military department, the level of wages in this field of activity, a lending program and other material and domestic issues.
Parents approached from the position of personal experience, while applicants most often approach such a choice indifferently - “parents said that it would be better this way”, because of this, the list of defining criteria is small: teaching at the university. At the same time, the quality of teaching comes first.
It is very interesting that local applicants (for example, Muscovites) are most often guided by the opinion of their parents and go to enter where, in their opinion, it is best. As for applicants from the periphery, their parents' opinion is much less influenced. From the choice is more conscious, and the goal is clearly indicated.
Our interest in the designated topic is also due to another feature that sociologists have noted in their works. This feature is that the choice of an educational institution becomes almost a spontaneous decision made the day before. After thinking about it, we came to the conclusion that most likely this is due to a very inconsistent system of entrance examinations. Unified State Examination, the list of mandatory exams changes almost on the last night before the tests, one university removes subjects, the second adds, confusion with passing scores, recognition of the results of the Unified State Examination, etc. As a result, many applicants began to apply to several universities at the same time in order to enter at least somewhere. Some universities did not set such minimums, some prestigious universities introduced restrictions on the minimum scores for admission to certain specialties.
A very difficult situation has developed with the Olympiads. This, of course, is not an alternative to the Unified State Examination, however, at the same time, this is a serious argument in favor of “taking” or “not taking” this applicant.
And one more topic that I would like to touch upon is state and non-state universities. Oddly enough, a society so stubbornly striving to become capitalist is afraid of non-state property in a panic. Paradox!
Scientists here decided to clarify the situation, it turned out that everything is not so scary and today's applicants are not too worried about the form of ownership of a higher educational institution. The most important thing is that the diploma "allows you to work not only at home." The development of this attitude of young people is stopped by the prejudiced opinion of the older generation, who are frightened by MMMemia and do not believe "merchants", as well as the opinion of some employers who, for some reason, consider a graduate of a commercial university to be a "fake" specialist for whom they "studied " money. But, fortunately, this phenomenon of stereotypical panic horror in front of everything non-state is becoming less and less common, and the choice of a university is, nevertheless, in accordance with the desire to be a specialist and work in a specialty.